vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and RxSight, Inc. (RXST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RxSight, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $20.4M, roughly 1.6× TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs -28.1%, a 93.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs -18.9%). Over the past eight quarters, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs 5.1%).
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
MITT vs RXST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.4M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $13.3M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | 67.1% | -34.8% |
| Net Margin | 65.0% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.7% | -18.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.0% | -54.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | $29.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | 67.1% | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.6% | -28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.7% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.2% |
| Q4 25 | 65.0% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 102.5% | -32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.9% | -21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.2% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 111.3% | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 121.6% | -30.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.47 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.8M | $228.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $560.7M | $275.7M |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $311.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.0M | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.7M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.5M | $229.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.7M | $237.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.5M | $237.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.9M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.3M | $125.4M |
| Q4 25 | $560.7M | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $559.8M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $536.4M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.9M | $279.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $543.4M | $281.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.1M | $277.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.5M | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $539.6M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $311.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $313.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $310.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $305.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $183.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $59.6M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.48× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-19.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-453.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -38.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MITT
Segment breakdown not available.
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |
