vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $26.3M, roughly 1.3× MicroAlgo Inc.). On growth, Voyager Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.1% vs -35.5%).
MicroAlgo Inc. is a technology enterprise specializing in custom algorithm optimization solutions. It mainly serves clients across smart city management, industrial internet, and e-commerce sectors, helping enterprises improve operational efficiency, reduce operating costs, and optimize data processing performance for real business scenarios.
MLGO vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.3M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-45.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | -130.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -35.5% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -64.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.3M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $17.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 27.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -52.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -7.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -130.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -7.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $319.4M | $429.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $317.6M | $404.5M |
| Total Assets | $330.8M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $429.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.4M | $468.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $21.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.6M | $554.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $66.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.8M | $685.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $75.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-39.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-66.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -189.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-263.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-2.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-66.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-2.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -189.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -15.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
