vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP) and PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC (PFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.7M vs $187.7M, roughly 1.2× MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.). On growth, PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -2.5%). PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($430.7M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC's revenue compounded faster (40.4% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is an American bank holding company and financial services corporation based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Its banking subsidiary, PNC Bank, operates in 27 states and the District of Columbia, with 2,629 branches and 9,523 ATMs. PNC Bank is one of the largest banks in the US by assets and by number of branches, deposits, and ATMs.
MMLP vs PFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $187.7M | $225.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 49.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $187.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $174.2M | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.7M | $221.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.7M | $214.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.5M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.3M | $205.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.9M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.5M | $163.8M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.4M | $71.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $46.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $-11.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 49.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 47.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 44.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | -13.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $209.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $537.1M | $25.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $209.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $299.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $258.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $234.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $205.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $244.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $290.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $427.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $451.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | $537.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $522.4M | $25.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.1M | $24.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $515.6M | $24.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $533.4M | $24.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $538.5M | $24.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.8M | $24.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.1M | $24.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $442.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.0M | $430.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.2% | 190.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 5.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $27.2M | $797.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $442.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $98.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | $186.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $426.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.8M | $69.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $76.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $430.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $182.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.9M | $87.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $425.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-696.0K | $75.5M |
| Q1 26 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 190.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 85.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 206.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 46.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MMLP
| Specialty products | $61.6M | 33% |
| Transportation * | $52.8M | 28% |
| Other | $46.5M | 25% |
| Terminalling and storage * | $22.4M | 12% |
| Sulfur services | $4.4M | 2% |
PFS
Segment breakdown not available.
