vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP) and POWELL INDUSTRIES INC (POWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POWELL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($251.2M vs $187.7M, roughly 1.3× MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.). POWELL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 1.7%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POWELL INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -2.5%). POWELL INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.6M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (0.8% CAGR vs -0.8%).
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.
Powell Industries, Inc. is a manufacturer of Integrated/Packaged Solutions and Electrical Equipment to monitor and control the distribution of electrical power in commercial and industrial markets founded in 1947. Its headquarters is in Houston, Texas.
MMLP vs POWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $187.7M | $251.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $41.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.1% | 19.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $3.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $187.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $174.2M | $251.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.7M | $298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.7M | $286.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.5M | $278.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.3M | $241.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.9M | $275.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.5M | $288.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.4M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $48.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.9M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $46.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.2% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.4% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 19.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.79 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $500.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $668.9M |
| Total Assets | $537.1M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $500.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $475.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $433.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $389.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $373.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $358.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $374.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $427.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $451.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $668.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $640.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $594.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $541.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $496.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $483.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $436.7M |
| Q1 26 | $537.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $522.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $515.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $533.4M | $965.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $538.5M | $912.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.8M | $928.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.1M | $869.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $43.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.0M | $41.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.2% | 16.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $27.2M | $161.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | $47.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.8M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.9M | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-696.0K | $12.4M |
| Q1 26 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.13× | 0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MMLP
| Specialty products | $61.6M | 33% |
| Transportation * | $52.8M | 28% |
| Other | $46.5M | 25% |
| Terminalling and storage * | $22.4M | 12% |
| Sulfur services | $4.4M | 2% |
POWL
| Oil And Gas Service | $97.9M | 39% |
| Electricity | $69.3M | 28% |
| Commercial And Other Industrial | $40.6M | 16% |
| Petrochemical | $22.8M | 9% |
| Other Customers | $12.0M | 5% |
| Light Rail Traction Power Customer | $8.6M | 3% |
