vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP) and Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.1M vs $187.7M, roughly 1.3× MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.). MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs 0.5%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.
Genpact Ltd. is an American information technology services, consulting, and outsourcing company headquartered in New York City, New York. Founded in Gurgaon, India, and legally domiciled in Bermuda, Genpact employs more than 125,000 people and provides services to clients in over 30 countries worldwide. Genpact is listed on the NYSE and generated revenues of US$4.48 billion in 2023.
MMLP vs REXR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $187.7M | $245.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $1.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 41.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.1% | 27.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $187.7M | $245.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $174.2M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.7M | $253.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.7M | $249.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.5M | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.3M | $242.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.9M | $241.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.5M | $237.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.4M | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.9M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $82.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 34.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $51.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $8.3B |
| Total Assets | $537.1M | $12.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $165.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $249.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $431.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $504.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $125.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $427.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $451.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.4M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.0B |
| Q1 26 | $537.1M | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $522.4M | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.1M | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $515.6M | $13.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $533.4M | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $538.5M | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.8M | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.1M | $12.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $27.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $542.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $149.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | $128.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $152.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $478.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.8M | $127.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $101.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $208.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $60.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.9M | $73.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-696.0K | $16.5M |
| Q1 26 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 84.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 134.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 153.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 49.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 35.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.13× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MMLP
| Specialty products | $61.6M | 33% |
| Transportation * | $52.8M | 28% |
| Other | $46.5M | 25% |
| Terminalling and storage * | $22.4M | 12% |
| Sulfur services | $4.4M | 2% |
REXR
Segment breakdown not available.
