vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP) and UP Fintech Holding Ltd (TIGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($187.7M vs $107.6M, roughly 1.7× UP Fintech Holding Ltd). UP Fintech Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 1.7%, a 26.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.
UP Fintech Holding Limited, operating under the Tiger Brokers brand, provides online financial services for global Chinese investors. It offers cross-market stock trading (US, Hong Kong, mainland China A-shares), fund management, margin financing and investor education for retail and institutional clients.
MMLP vs TIGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $187.7M | $107.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $30.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $187.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $174.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.5M | $107.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.5M | $166.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $15.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $27.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $155.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-696.0K | $153.8M |
| Q1 26 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 92.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.13× | 10.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MMLP
| Specialty products | $61.6M | 33% |
| Transportation * | $52.8M | 28% |
| Other | $46.5M | 25% |
| Terminalling and storage * | $22.4M | 12% |
| Sulfur services | $4.4M | 2% |
TIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
