vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC (MMSI) and TELEFLEX INC (TFX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELEFLEX INC runs the higher net margin — 177.8% vs 9.6%, a 168.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.9% vs -150.5%). MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.0M vs $-92.9M). Over the past eight quarters, TELEFLEX INC's revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
Merit Medical Systems Inc. is a global medical device firm that designs, manufactures, and markets a broad portfolio of interventional and diagnostic products used across cardiology, radiology, oncology, endoscopy, and critical care segments. It primarily serves hospitals, clinics, and healthcare providers worldwide, focusing on minimally invasive solutions that enhance patient outcomes and streamline clinical workflows.
Teleflex Incorporated, headquartered in Wayne, Pennsylvania, is an American provider of specialty medical devices for a range of procedures in critical care and surgery. Teleflex has annual revenues of $2.4 billion, operations in 40 countries, and more than 15,000 employees. By 2011, the company had substantially realigned to focus on its current business as a medical-device manufacturer, having undergone several years of active acquisitions and divestitures. Teleflex has been associated with...
MMSI vs TFX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.9M | $-401.9M |
| Net Profit | $38.0M | $-714.3M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.6% | 177.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.9% | -150.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -422.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | $-15.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.9M | $-401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.2M | $913.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.5M | $780.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $355.4M | $700.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.2M | $795.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.8M | $764.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.0M | $749.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.5M | $737.8M |
| Q4 25 | $38.0M | $-714.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $-408.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | $122.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.1M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.9M | $-136.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $111.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.7M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.2M | $15.3M |
| Q4 25 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.5% | 49.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | 55.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.4% | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.7% | 55.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.9% | 56.4% |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | -44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | -0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 177.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.64 | $-15.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-9.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $2.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $2.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $-2.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $2.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.61 | $1.69 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.48 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $446.4M | $378.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $734.0M | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.46× | 0.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $446.4M | $378.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.5M | $354.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $341.8M | $253.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.5M | $284.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $376.7M | $290.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $523.1M | $243.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $636.7M | $238.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $581.9M | $237.4M |
| Q4 25 | $734.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $732.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $731.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $730.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $729.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $750.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $801.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $800.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $7.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.46× | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.48× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.49× | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.51× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.53× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $98.5M | $-92.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $74.0M | $-92.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.8% | 23.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.2% | -0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $215.7M | $1.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $98.5M | $-92.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $107.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $73.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.7M | $202.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $231.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.5M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.2M | $112.8M |
| Q4 25 | $74.0M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.5M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.6M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.3M | $170.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.0M | $209.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.9M | $56.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $74.4M |
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 10.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.56× | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.35× | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.92× | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.28× | 7.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MMSI
| Other | $154.6M | 39% |
| Peripheral Intervention | $93.2M | 24% |
| Cardiac Intervention | $50.2M | 13% |
| OEM | $42.6M | 11% |
| Custom Procedural Solutions | $33.1M | 8% |
| Endoscopy Segment | $20.1M | 5% |
TFX
Segment breakdown not available.
