vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MONRO, INC. (MNRO) and PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEGASYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($430.0M vs $293.4M, roughly 1.5× MONRO, INC.). PEGASYSTEMS INC runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 3.8%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MONRO, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.0% vs -9.6%). PEGASYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($206.5M vs $9.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PEGASYSTEMS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -2.7%).
Monro, Inc. is an automotive services company founded and headquartered in Rochester, New York, U.S. As of 2025, Monro has 1,260 locations making them the second-largest automotive services company in North America after Driven Brands by number of locations and by revenue.
Pegasystems Inc. (Pega) is a global software company based in Waltham, Massachusetts, in the United States, and founded in 1983. The company has been publicly traded since 1996 as PEGA (NASDAQ). Pega is a low-code platform for workflow automation and generative AI-powered decision-making for businesses.
MNRO vs PEGA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $293.4M | $430.0M |
| Net Profit | $11.1M | $32.8M |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.8% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.0% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 143.1% | -61.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $430.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.4M | $504.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.9M | $381.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $301.0M | $384.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $295.0M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $305.8M | $490.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $301.4M | $325.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $293.2M | $351.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $234.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.1M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.3M | $85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9M | $6.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | 72.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.5% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.0% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.3% | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | 72.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.18 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.74 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $270.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $45.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $604.9M | $705.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $270.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $425.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $351.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $411.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.8M | $371.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $740.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9M | $703.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $665.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $604.9M | $787.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $601.7M | $596.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $604.9M | $624.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $620.8M | $611.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $648.9M | $585.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $651.9M | $473.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $654.4M | $435.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $17.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | $206.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.1% | 48.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $49.6M | $494.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.8M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $86.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.9M | $204.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | $95.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.6M | $40.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $206.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.3M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2M | $202.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $92.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.6M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8M | $38.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 42.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.60× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.71× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.23× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.37× | 6.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNRO
| Tires | $150.2M | 51% |
| Maintenance | $73.5M | 25% |
| Brakes | $35.1M | 12% |
| Steering | $24.9M | 8% |
| Batteries | $6.2M | 2% |
| Exhaust | $3.2M | 1% |
PEGA
| Pega Cloud | $205.0M | 48% |
| Subscription license | $94.9M | 22% |
| Maintenance | $75.3M | 18% |
| Consulting | $54.8M | 13% |
