vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monster Beverage (MNST) and Motorola Solutions (MSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Motorola Solutions is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.6× Monster Beverage). Monster Beverage runs the higher net margin — 21.1% vs 19.2%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monster Beverage posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs 12.3%). Motorola Solutions produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $351.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Motorola Solutions's revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Monster Beverage Corporation is an American beverage company that manufactures energy drinks including Monster Energy, Relentless, Reign and Burn. The company was originally founded as Hansen's in 1935 in Southern California, originally selling juice products. The company renamed itself as Monster Beverage in 2012.
Motorola Solutions, Inc., is an American technology company that provides safety and security products and services. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, the company provides critical communications, video security, and command center technologies, used by public safety agencies and enterprises. It was formed in 2011 by the division of Motorola, Inc.
MNST vs MSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $3.4B |
| Net Profit | $449.2M | $649.0M |
| Gross Margin | 55.5% | 52.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 27.9% |
| Net Margin | 21.1% | 19.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.9% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $3.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $449.2M | $649.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.5M | $562.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $488.8M | $513.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.0M | $430.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.7M | $611.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.9M | $562.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.4M | $443.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.0M | $-39.0M |
| Q4 25 | 55.5% | 52.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.7% | 51.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.7% | 51.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.5% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.3% | 51.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.2% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.6% | 51.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.1% | 49.9% |
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.7% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.9% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.7% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | 21.7% |
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.3% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.3B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $10.0B | $19.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $894.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $748.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $748.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | $802.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6B | $521.0M |
| Q4 25 | $10.0B | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $18.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7B | $16.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2B | $14.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $14.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1B | $13.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.4M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $351.2M | $1.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.5% | 33.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.0B | $2.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $379.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $745.1M | $798.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.0M | $273.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.6M | $510.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $461.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.4M | $759.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.3M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $412.1M | $382.0M |
| Q4 25 | $351.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $701.5M | $732.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $434.6M | $225.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $478.5M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.4M | $984.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $571.4M | $702.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.5M | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $346.1M | $336.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | 32.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 14.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.42× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.67× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNST
| Monster Energy Drinks Segment | $1.2B | 57% |
| Sales Revenue Product Line | $905.5M | 42% |
| Strategic Brands Segment | $50.3M | 2% |
| Alcohol Brands Segment | $29.0M | 1% |
MSI
| Product And Systems Integration Segment | $1.5B | 45% |
| Services And Software Segment | $833.0M | 25% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $772.0M | 23% |
| Command Center Software | $258.0M | 8% |
