vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monster Beverage (MNST) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.2× Monster Beverage). Monster Beverage runs the higher net margin — 21.1% vs 6.3%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monster Beverage posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs 7.4%). Restaurant Brands International Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($453.0M vs $351.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Restaurant Brands International Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (19.1% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Monster Beverage Corporation is an American beverage company that manufactures energy drinks including Monster Energy, Relentless, Reign and Burn. The company was originally founded as Hansen's in 1935 in Southern California, originally selling juice products. The company renamed itself as Monster Beverage in 2012.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (RBI) is an American-Canadian multinational fast food holding company. It was formed in 2014 by the $12.5 billion merger between American fast food restaurant chain Burger King and Canadian coffee shop and restaurant chain Tim Hortons, and expanded by the purchases of Popeyes and Firehouse Subs in 2017 and 2021, respectively. The company is the fifth-largest operator of fast food restaurants in the world after Subway, McDonald's, Starbucks and Yum! Brands....
MNST vs QSR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $449.2M | $155.0M |
| Gross Margin | 55.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 25.2% |
| Net Margin | 21.1% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | 7.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.9% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $449.2M | $155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.5M | $436.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $488.8M | $263.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.0M | $221.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.7M | $361.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.9M | $357.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.4M | $399.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.0M | $328.0M |
| Q4 25 | 55.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.1% | 65.2% |
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.7% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 27.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.7% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | 31.3% |
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.3% | 18.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $13.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.3B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $10.0B | $25.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.1M | $13.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $748.8M | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $748.7M | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | $8.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $10.0B | $25.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $25.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7B | $25.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2B | $24.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $24.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $25.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1B | $24.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1B | $23.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 4.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | 4.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | 4.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.4M | $555.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $351.2M | $453.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.5% | 18.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 3.58× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.0B | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $379.4M | $555.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $745.1M | $592.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.0M | $449.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.6M | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $461.7M | $481.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.4M | $540.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.3M | $334.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $412.1M | $148.0M |
| Q4 25 | $351.2M | $453.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $701.5M | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $434.6M | $411.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $478.5M | $54.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.4M | $404.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $571.4M | $485.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.5M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $346.1M | $122.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.42× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 1.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.67× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.93× | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNST
| Monster Energy Drinks Segment | $1.2B | 57% |
| Sales Revenue Product Line | $905.5M | 42% |
| Strategic Brands Segment | $50.3M | 2% |
| Alcohol Brands Segment | $29.0M | 1% |
QSR
| CA | $1.0B | 41% |
| Other | $330.0M | 13% |
| Advertising | $308.0M | 12% |
| Others | $284.0M | 12% |
| Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen | $195.0M | 8% |
| Burger King | $185.0M | 8% |
| Royalty | $87.0M | 4% |
| Firehouse Subs | $59.0M | 2% |
| Franchisor | $7.0M | 0% |