vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.5M vs $43.4M, roughly 1.7× Montauk Renewables, Inc.). On growth, Montauk Renewables, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (56.7% vs 27.7%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
MNTK vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.4M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 56.7% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $43.4M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.6M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.8M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-464.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-712.0K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.8% | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.4% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.8M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $126.0M | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $263.1M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $435.5M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.3M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | $126.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.7M | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $263.1M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.7M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.7M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.2M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.4M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.3M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.3M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $254.3M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $435.5M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.3M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.5M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.2M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $354.7M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $337.0K | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.1M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -94.7% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 95.5% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-86.2M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $337.0K | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $724.0K | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.0K | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-41.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.5M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -94.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.8% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 95.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.43× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
