vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and IMPINJ INC (PI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMPINJ INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.3M vs $43.4M, roughly 1.7× Montauk Renewables, Inc.). IMPINJ INC runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs 5.7%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Montauk Renewables, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (56.7% vs -0.0%). IMPINJ INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.2M vs $-41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Montauk Renewables, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs -14.9%).
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
Impinj, Inc. is an American manufacturer of radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices and software. The company was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. The company was started based on the research done at the California Institute of Technology by Carver Mead and Chris Diorio. Impinj currently produces EPC Class 1, Gen 2 passive UHF RFID chips, RFID readers, RFID reader chips, and RFID antennas, and software applications for encoding chips, and gathering business ...
MNTK vs PI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.4M | $74.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.5M | $8.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | 30.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.7% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 56.7% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.4M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $96.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.6M | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $95.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.3M | $102.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-464.0K | $-8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $221.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-712.0K | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | 56.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.5% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | -13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | -11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.8M | $131.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $126.0M | $241.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $263.1M | — |
| Total Assets | $435.5M | $502.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $190.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $193.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $147.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3M | $220.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $241.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $126.0M | $280.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | $283.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $263.1M | $209.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.7M | $195.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.7M | $187.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.2M | $160.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.4M | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.3M | $136.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.3M | $117.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $502.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $435.5M | $545.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.3M | $516.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.5M | $508.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.2M | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $476.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.0M | $446.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 1.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $337.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.1M | $2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -94.7% | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 95.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-86.2M | $61.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $337.0K | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $724.0K | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.0K | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-41.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.2M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.5M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $44.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -94.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.9% | 43.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 95.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | 45.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
PI
Segment breakdown not available.
