vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.1M vs $43.4M, roughly 1.9× Montauk Renewables, Inc.). Montauk Renewables, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.7% vs -38.1%, a 43.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Montauk Renewables, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (56.7% vs 20.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
MNTK vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.4M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $2.5M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.7% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 56.7% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.5% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.4M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.6M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.3M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-464.0K | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-712.0K | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.5% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.4% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.5% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.8M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $126.0M | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $263.1M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $435.5M | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $126.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7M | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $263.1M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.7M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.7M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.2M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.4M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.3M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.3M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $435.5M | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.3M | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.5M | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.2M | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.0M | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $337.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -94.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 95.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-86.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $337.0K | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $724.0K | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.0K | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-41.1M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.2M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.5M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.3M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -94.7% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.8% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.9% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 95.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
