vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.4M vs $27.1M, roughly 1.6× Rumble Inc.). Montauk Renewables, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.7% vs -120.8%, a 126.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Montauk Renewables, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (56.7% vs -10.5%). Rumble Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-31.7M vs $-41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Rumble Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.2% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
MNTK vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.4M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $2.5M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.7% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 56.7% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.5% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $43.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.6M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.3M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.8M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-464.0K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-712.0K | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.8% | -79.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.5% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.4% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.5% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | -244.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.8M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $126.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $263.1M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $435.5M | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.3M | $183.8M |
| Q4 25 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $263.1M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.7M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.2M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.4M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.3M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.3M | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $254.3M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $435.5M | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.3M | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.2M | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.0M | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $354.7M | $263.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $337.0K | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.1M | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -94.7% | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 95.5% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-86.2M | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $337.0K | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $724.0K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.0K | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-41.1M | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.2M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.3M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | -94.7% | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.8% | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.9% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.8% | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | 95.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |
