vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and RxSight, Inc. (RXST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.4M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.3× RxSight, Inc.). Montauk Renewables, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.7% vs -28.1%, a 33.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Montauk Renewables, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (56.7% vs -18.9%). RxSight, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.3M vs $-41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Montauk Renewables, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
MNTK vs RXST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.4M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $2.5M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -34.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.7% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 56.7% | -18.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.5% | -54.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $43.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.6M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.3M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.8M | $29.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-464.0K | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-712.0K | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | 69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.8% | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.5% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.4% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | -36.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | -32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | -21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.5% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | -30.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.8M | $228.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $126.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $263.1M | $275.7M |
| Total Assets | $435.5M | $311.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $229.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | $237.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $237.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.3M | $125.4M |
| Q4 25 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $263.1M | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.7M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.7M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.2M | $279.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.4M | $281.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.3M | $277.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.3M | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $254.3M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $435.5M | $311.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.3M | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.5M | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.2M | $313.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0M | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $310.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.0M | $305.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $354.7M | $183.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $337.0K | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.1M | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -94.7% | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 95.5% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-86.2M | $-19.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $337.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $724.0K | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.0K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-41.1M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.5M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.3M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $-453.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | -94.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.8% | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.9% | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.8% | -38.2% |
| Q4 25 | 95.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |
