vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MOGU Inc. (MOGU) and TRINITY BIOTECH PLC (TRIB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRINITY BIOTECH PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.5M vs $19.5M, roughly 1.6× MOGU Inc.). TRINITY BIOTECH PLC runs the higher net margin — -33.0% vs -44.3%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. TRINITY BIOTECH PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.1M vs $-10.7M).
Mogu Mogu is a brand of fruit-flavoured drink with pieces of nata de coco, produced by Thailand-based Sappe Public Company Limited and exported to many international markets, especially South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and France.
Trinity Biotech PLC develops, manufactures and markets diagnostic test kits and systems for clinical laboratories and point-of-care settings. Its product portfolio covers diabetes management, infectious diseases, cardiac health, autoimmune disorders and coagulation, with core markets across North America, Europe and emerging economies.
MOGU vs TRIB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.5M | $30.5M |
| Net Profit | $-8.6M | $-10.1M |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | -71.6% | -23.2% |
| Net Margin | -44.3% | -33.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $37.2M |
| Q1 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-22.0M |
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 37.0% |
| Q1 25 | -71.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -5.0% |
| Q1 25 | -44.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.0% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -59.0% |
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.3M | $5.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $70.1M | $-29.4M |
| Total Assets | $118.3M | $94.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $10.5M |
| Q1 25 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-29.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $15.8M |
| Q1 25 | $118.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $107.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.4M | $-3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.7M | $-4.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -55.2% | -13.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | $-9.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-3.4M |
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-3.7M |
| Q1 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -84.0% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -10.0% |
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
