vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MOGU Inc. (MOGU) and TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC (TSBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.7M vs $19.5M, roughly 1.1× MOGU Inc.). TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 37.8% vs -44.3%, a 82.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.4% vs -12.4%). TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.6M vs $-10.7M).
Mogu Mogu is a brand of fruit-flavoured drink with pieces of nata de coco, produced by Thailand-based Sappe Public Company Limited and exported to many international markets, especially South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and France.
Timberland Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating primarily across Washington state. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including checking and savings accounts, residential and commercial mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management solutions for local retail and small to mid-sized business clients.
MOGU vs TSBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.5M | $21.7M |
| Net Profit | $-8.6M | $8.2M |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -71.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -44.3% | 37.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.4% | 10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.0% | 19.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $18.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -71.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -49.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.3% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.0% | 31.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.70 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.3M | $246.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $70.1M | $268.4M |
| Total Assets | $118.3M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $246.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $243.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $193.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $191.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $158.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.2M | $180.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $268.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $262.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $256.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.1M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $249.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $245.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $241.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.5M | $238.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0M | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.4M | $6.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.7M | $5.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -55.2% | 25.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.74× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $56.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.6M | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.6M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 126.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -55.2% | 61.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 111.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -84.0% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.7% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
