vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Molina Healthcare (MOH) and GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. (TV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5B vs $10.8B, roughly 1.3× Molina Healthcare). Molina Healthcare runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -51.8%, a 51.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Molina Healthcare, Inc. is a managed care company headquartered in Long Beach, California, United States. The company provides health insurance to individuals through government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.
"Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.", simply known as "Televisa", is a Mexican telecommunications and broadcasting company and the largest in Latin America A major Latin American mass media corporation, it often presents itself as the largest producer of Spanish-language content.
MOH vs TV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.8B | $14.5B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $-7.5B |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | -51.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $10.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $14.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5B | $14.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | $14.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-160.0M | $-7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.0M | $552.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $298.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.79 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.75 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.45 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.43 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.65 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.3B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $16.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 77.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-298.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-125.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-302.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-224.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $873.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-219.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-299.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-163.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-344.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-235.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $838.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-246.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 77.29× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MOH
| Premium revenue | $10.2B | 94% |
| Premium tax revenue | $504.0M | 5% |
| Investment income | $98.0M | 1% |
| Other revenue | $22.0M | 0% |
TV
Segment breakdown not available.
