vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $62.0M, roughly 1.5× MID PENN BANCORP INC). On growth, MID PENN BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, MID PENN BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
MPB vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.0M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $19.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 43.6% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 31.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.0M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.3M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.7M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.3M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.1M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.3M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 43.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.4% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.8% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.7% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.83 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.79 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.71 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.74 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.71 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.73 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $814.1M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $814.1M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $796.3M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.7M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $667.9M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.0M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $573.1M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.7M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.0M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.0M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $71.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 115.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 115.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 93.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.02× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPB
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |