vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MID PENN BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.0M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.3× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). MID PENN BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 31.4% vs -1.9%, a 33.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 30.8%).
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
MPB vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.0M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $19.4M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | 43.6% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | 31.4% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.0% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.0M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.6% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.83 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.79 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.71 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.74 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.73 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $814.1M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $814.1M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $796.3M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.7M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $667.9M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.0M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $573.1M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.0M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $71.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 115.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.0M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 115.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 93.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.02× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPB
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
