vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mega Matrix Inc (MPU) and QUICKLOGIC Corp (QUIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mega Matrix Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1M vs $5.7M, roughly 1.1× QUICKLOGIC Corp). QUICKLOGIC Corp runs the higher net margin — -5.4% vs -177.4%, a 172.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, QUICKLOGIC Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-24.1% vs -40.9%).
QuickLogic Corp is a fabless semiconductor company developing low-power customizable FPGAs, embedded FPGA IP, and edge sensor processing solutions. Its offerings serve global wearables, IoT, mobile electronics, and industrial markets, enabling energy-efficient low-latency on-device processing for edge AI and sensing use cases.
MPU vs QUIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $5.7M |
| Net Profit | $-10.8M | $-305.0K |
| Gross Margin | 47.7% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | -156.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | -177.4% | -5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -40.9% | -24.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -291.1% | -114.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.7M |
| Q3 25 | $-10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-305.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $108.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.2M |
| Q3 25 | 47.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | 59.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 76.9% |
| Q3 25 | -156.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | -38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 19.2% |
| Q3 25 | -177.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.8% | -49.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -37.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 17.9% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.4M | $24.9M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $51.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $14.0M |
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.4M | $49.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $36.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $116.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -20.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 22.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-5.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-220.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $130.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-83.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $62.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -102.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -22.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 96.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 24.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPU
Segment breakdown not available.
QUIK
| North America | $3.0M | 53% |
| Other | $2.7M | 47% |
