vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mega Matrix Inc (MPU) and XCF Global, Inc. (SAFX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
XCF Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.6M vs $6.1M, roughly 1.6× Mega Matrix Inc). XCF Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -131.0% vs -177.4%, a 46.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
MPU vs SAFX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $9.6M |
| Net Profit | $-10.8M | $-12.5M |
| Gross Margin | 47.7% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | -156.3% | -90.3% |
| Net Margin | -177.4% | -131.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -40.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -291.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-10.8M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | 47.7% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -156.3% | -90.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | -177.4% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.8M | $879.2K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $122.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.4M | $5.2M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $408.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 23.55× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $879.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $122.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $37.4M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $408.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 23.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $-13.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
