vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC (MPW) and Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.3M vs $220.2M, roughly 1.2× Shutterstock, Inc.). MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -7.3%, a 13.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Shutterstock, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.4% CAGR vs -0.2%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Shutterstock, Inc. is an American provider of stock photography, stock footage, stock music, and editing tools; it is headquartered in New York. Founded in 2002 by programmer and photographer Jon Oringer, Shutterstock maintains a library of around 200 million royalty-free stock photos, vector graphics, and illustrations, with around 10 million video clips and music tracks available for licensing. Originally a subscription site only, Shutterstock expanded beyond subscriptions into à la carte p...
MPW vs SSTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.3M | $220.2M |
| Net Profit | $17.6M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | 95.8% | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.6% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 104.3% | -1021.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | $220.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.5M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.4M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $242.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $231.8M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.8M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $266.6M | $220.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $271.3M | $214.3M |
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-77.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-98.4M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-118.3M | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-412.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-801.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-320.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-875.6M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | 95.8% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 91.8% | 60.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.5% | 58.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 98.4% | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 84.9% | 58.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.0% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.7% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -173.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -350.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -114.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -318.6% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -40.9% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -177.8% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -354.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -120.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -322.7% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.68 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.34 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.54 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.46 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $540.9M | $178.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | $581.0M |
| Total Assets | $15.0B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.11× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $540.9M | $178.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.6M | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $509.8M | $116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $673.5M | $112.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.3M | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.6M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.5M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $224.3M | $71.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $581.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $594.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $586.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $547.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $522.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $520.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $541.3M |
| Q4 25 | $15.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.51× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $230.8M | $36.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $25.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $123.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $230.8M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.7M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0K | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $245.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.2M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.3M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.3M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-952.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 13.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
