vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC (MPW) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $270.3M, roughly 1.8× MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC). MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 0.4%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs 4.4%). Over the past eight quarters, OLYMPIC STEEL INC's revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -0.2%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
MPW vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.3M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $17.6M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 95.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.6% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 104.3% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.5M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.4M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $231.8M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.8M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $266.6M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $271.3M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-77.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-98.4M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-118.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-412.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-801.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-320.6M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-875.6M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 95.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 91.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 98.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 84.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -173.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -350.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -114.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -318.6% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -40.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -177.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -354.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -120.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -322.7% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.68 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.34 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.54 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.46 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $540.9M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $15.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.11× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $540.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $509.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $673.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $224.3M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6B | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4B | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1B | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $15.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.00× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.51× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.51× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $230.8M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.11× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $230.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0K | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $245.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.2M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.3M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 13.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPW
Segment breakdown not available.
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
