vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.2M vs $531.4M, roughly 1.4× PJT Partners Inc.). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 10.0%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 12.9%). PJT Partners Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($138.6M vs $63.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 27.5%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
MPWR vs PJT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $531.4M |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | $53.4M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 23.1% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | 4.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $531.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $442.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $401.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $321.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $470.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $320.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $358.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $327.1M |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $53.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $54.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $51.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $28.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $32.6M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 16.5% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $538.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $308.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $538.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $400.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $214.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $194.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $483.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $164.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $215.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $308.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $228.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $167.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $148.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $159.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $133.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $174.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $155.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | $138.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | 2.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | $480.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $155.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $256.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $-75.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $195.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $180.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $193.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $-38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | $178.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $-77.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $178.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | $193.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | -24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | 55.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | -12.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 2.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 6.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 5.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | -1.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | 3.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 8.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | -1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
