vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RH is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($883.8M vs $751.2M, roughly 1.2× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 4.1%, a 18.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 8.9%). RH produced more free cash flow last quarter ($83.0M vs $63.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 9.4%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
MPWR vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $738.3M |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | 43.5% |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $101.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $123.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $-289.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $-297.4M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $4.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $-114.0M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | $-251.5M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | -10.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
