vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Meridian Corp (MRBK) and RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($60.1M vs $34.2M, roughly 1.8× Meridian Corp). Meridian Corp runs the higher net margin — 428.0% vs -92.6%, a 520.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.8% vs 5.1%). Over the past eight quarters, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (43.8% CAGR vs 18.0%).
Meridian Audio is a consumer audio and home theatre equipment manufacturer based in the United Kingdom. Bob Stuart and Allen Boothroyd founded the company in 1977 under the name Boothroyd-Stuart. In 1985 the company released a CD player under the brand name, Meridian. The company also created the lossless compression format Meridian Lossless Packing in 1998 and the lossy Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) format in 2014.
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
MRBK vs RYTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.2M | $60.1M |
| Net Profit | $7.2M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | -87.1% |
| Net Margin | 428.0% | -92.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 83.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 28.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.61 | $-0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $60.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.2M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.6M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.1M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $29.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-55.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $-43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $-43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $-32.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 88.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | -87.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.2% | -82.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | -102.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | -143.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | -98.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | -132.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | -139.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -92.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 428.0% | -83.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | -103.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | -96.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | -151.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 366.8% | -103.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | -131.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | -110.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.83 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.61 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.58 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.42 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $340.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $199.7M | $122.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $442.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $340.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $314.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $319.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $122.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.7M | $139.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.0M | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $178.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $173.6M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.5M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.4M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.4M | $39.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $442.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $506.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $372.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $386.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $363.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $381.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $24.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 65.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.38× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.3M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.0M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.2M | $-29.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 101.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.66× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.78× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
