vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MERCURY SYSTEMS INC (MRCY) and PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp (PRDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MERCURY SYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($232.9M vs $211.6M, roughly 1.1× PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp). On growth, PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.0% vs 4.4%). MERCURY SYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($45.7M vs $37.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 5.7%).
Mercury Systems, Inc. is a technology company serving the aerospace and defense industry. It designs, develops and manufactures open architecture computer hardware and software products, including secure embedded processing modules and subsystems, avionics mission computers and displays, rugged secure computer servers, and trusted microelectronics components, modules and subsystems.
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is a public company that owns five for-profit universities in the United States: American Intercontinental University, Colorado Technical University, California Southern University, Trident University International, and University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences. The company was previously known as Career Education Corporation.
MRCY vs PRDO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $232.9M | $211.6M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | 19.8% |
| Net Margin | -6.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 4.4% | 20.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.26 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $232.9M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.2M | $211.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.1M | $209.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.4M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.1M | $176.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.4M | $169.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | $166.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $208.3M | $168.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.5M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.2M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.5M | $38.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.6M | $39.4M |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.8% | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 26.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.2% | 27.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | 27.5% |
| Q4 25 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.6% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.4% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.26 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.33 | $0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.30 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.30 | $0.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.77 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $335.0M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $972.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $335.0M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.7M | $159.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $309.1M | $172.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.8M | $132.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $242.6M | $109.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.1M | $238.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $180.5M | $127.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.6M | $125.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $972.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $997.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $984.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $970.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $959.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $935.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $899.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $51.6M | $40.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $45.7M | $37.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 17.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.4M | $216.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $51.6M | $40.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.1M | $78.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $65.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.8M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.8M | $54.5M |
| Q4 25 | $45.7M | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $63.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.9M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.9M | $50.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.4M | $37.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-25.7M | $53.3M |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.4% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.33× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRCY
| Airborne | $84.2M | 36% |
| Components | $48.7M | 21% |
| Other End Applications | $36.8M | 16% |
| Electronic Warfare | $27.5M | 12% |
| Other Sensor And Effector Applications | $23.9M | 10% |
| Space | $11.9M | 5% |
PRDO
| CTU | $107.0M | 51% |
| AIUS | $60.8M | 29% |
| University Of St Augustine For Health Sciences Llc | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $1.1M | 1% |
