vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Microsoft (MSFT) and Shell plc (SHEL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Microsoft is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($81.3B vs $65.4B, roughly 1.2× Shell plc). Microsoft runs the higher net margin — 47.3% vs 5.6%, a 41.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Microsoft posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.7% vs -12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Microsoft's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs -11.9%).
Microsoft Corporation is an American multinational technology conglomerate headquartered in Redmond, Washington. Founded in 1975, the company became influential in the rise of personal computers through software like Windows, and has since expanded to Internet services, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, video gaming, and other fields.
Shell plc is a British multinational oil and gas company, headquartered in London, England. Shell is a public limited company with a primary listing on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and secondary listings on Euronext Amsterdam and the New York Stock Exchange. A core component of Big Oil, Shell is the second largest investor-owned oil and gas company in the world by revenue, and among the world's largest companies out of any industry. Measured by both its own emissions, and the emissions of ...
MSFT vs SHEL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $81.3B | $65.4B |
| Net Profit | $38.5B | $3.6B |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 47.3% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.7% | -12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.5% | -0.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $81.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.4B | $65.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.1B | $69.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.7B | $74.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.9B | $72.5B |
| Q4 25 | $38.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.9B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | 68.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 47.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.5% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $5.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.72 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.65 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.46 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.30 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.94 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.94 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.5B | $32.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $40.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $390.9B | $183.1B |
| Total Assets | $665.3B | $387.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $89.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.6B | $32.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.6B | $35.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.5B | $38.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.0B | $39.9B |
| Q4 25 | $40.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $390.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $363.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.5B | $183.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.5B | $187.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $253.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $665.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $636.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.0B | $387.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $562.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $523.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $512.2B | $394.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.18× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.8B | $11.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.9B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 36.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.93× | 3.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $77.4B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.6B | $11.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.2B | $13.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.9B | $13.3B |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.57× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.43× | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.69× | 3.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.45× | 1.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MSFT
| Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services | $24.5B | 30% |
| Products | $16.5B | 20% |
| More Personal Computing | $14.3B | 18% |
| Gaming | $6.0B | 7% |
| Linked In Corporation | $5.1B | 6% |
| Windows And Devices | $4.5B | 6% |
| Search And News Advertising | $3.8B | 5% |
| Microsoft Three Six Five Consumer Products And Cloud Services | $2.3B | 3% |
| Dynamics Products And Cloud Services | $2.2B | 3% |
| Enterprise And Partner Services | $2.0B | 3% |
| Other Products And Services | $6.0M | 0% |
SHEL
Segment breakdown not available.
