vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Seneca Foods Corp (SENEB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Seneca Foods Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $271.6M, roughly 1.9× MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.). MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.0% vs 8.8%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.5% vs 1.1%). MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.0M vs $22.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Seneca Foods Corp's revenue compounded faster (77.1% CAGR vs 22.4%).
MACOM Technology Solutions, Inc. is an American developer and producer of radio, microwave, and millimeter wave semiconductor devices and components. The company is headquartered in Lowell, Massachusetts, and in 2005 was Lowell's largest private employer. MACOM is certified to the ISO 9001 international quality standard and ISO 14001 environmental standard. The company has design centers and sales offices in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia.
Seneca Foods Corporation is an American food processor and distributor headquartered in Fairport, New York, United States. Seneca Foods Corporation conducts its business almost entirely in food packaging, which contributed to about 98% of the company's fiscal year net sales in 2017. Canned vegetables represented 65%, fruit products represented 23%, frozen fruit and vegetables represented 11% and fruit chip products represented 1% of the total food packaging net sales. Non-food packaging sales...
MTSI vs SENEB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $271.6M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $48.8M | $44.8M |
| Gross Margin | 55.9% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 11.8% |
| Net Margin | 18.0% | 8.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.5% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.1% | 205.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | $6.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $271.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.2M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.1M | $460.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $235.9M | $297.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.1M | $345.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $502.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.7M | $425.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.5M | $304.7M |
| Q1 26 | $48.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.5M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.5M | $601.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.4M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | $12.7M |
| Q1 26 | 55.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 54.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.2% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -76.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $6.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $4.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $2.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.30 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $1.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $1.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $768.5M | $33.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $275.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $713.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $768.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $786.0M | $33.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.2M | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $681.5M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $656.5M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $581.9M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $521.5M | $5.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $275.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $280.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $293.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $416.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $504.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $572.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $713.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $672.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $644.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $633.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $612.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $598.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $588.9M |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $42.9M | $31.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.0M | $22.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.0% | 4.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 0.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $161.5M | $168.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.4M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.7M | $53.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $91.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.3M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.4M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.5M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.3M | $81.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.1M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.5M | $38.3M |
| Q1 26 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.54× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.65× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.22× | 3.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 152.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.12× | 5.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 3.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTSI
| Industrial Defense | $117.7M | 43% |
| Data Center | $85.8M | 32% |
| Telecom | $68.1M | 25% |
SENEB
| Canned Vegetables | $430.2M | 85% |
| Fruit | $34.6M | 7% |
| Frozen | $29.3M | 6% |
| Manufactured Product Other | $10.8M | 2% |
| Snack | $3.4M | 1% |
