vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metallus Inc. (MTUS) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metallus Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.3M vs $260.4M, roughly 1.2× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). Metallus Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs 1.4%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Metallus Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.9% vs -9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
MTUS vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $308.3M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 8.1% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 315.4% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $308.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.9M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.6M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.5M | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.5M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.2M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.7M | $220.9M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.4M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $3.6M |
| Q1 26 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $104.0M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $683.0M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $156.7M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.3M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.7M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $254.6M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $17.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $683.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $686.0M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $697.7M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $686.1M | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.5M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $712.7M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.3M | $62.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $429.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-38.9M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.3M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $39.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.4M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-66.4M | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.9M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $-2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.7% | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.72× | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.41× | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.92× | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.80× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTUS
Segment breakdown not available.
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
