vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metallus Inc. (MTUS) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $308.3M, roughly 1.4× Metallus Inc.). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 1.8%, a 46.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Metallus Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.9% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
MTUS vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $308.3M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 8.1% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 315.4% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $308.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.9M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.6M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.5M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.5M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.2M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.7M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.4M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.1% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.9% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.6% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $104.0M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $683.0M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $156.7M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.3M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.7M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $254.6M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $683.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $686.0M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $697.7M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $686.1M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.5M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $712.7M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.3M | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-38.9M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.3M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.4M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-66.4M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.9M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.7% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.72× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.41× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.92× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.80× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
