vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC (MTX) and Sphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($519.5M vs $393.8M, roughly 1.3× Sphere Entertainment Co.). Sphere Entertainment Co. runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs 7.2%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Sphere Entertainment Co.'s revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Compass Minerals International, Inc is an American public company that, through its subsidiaries, is a leading producer of minerals, including salt, magnesium chloride and sulfate of potash. Based in Overland Park, Kansas; the company provides bulk treated and untreated highway deicing salt to customers in North America and the United Kingdom and plant nutrition products to growers worldwide. Compass Minerals also produces consumer deicing and water conditioning products, consumer and commerc...
Sphere Entertainment Co. is an American entertainment holding company based in New York City, and controlled by the family of Charles Dolan. It owns the Sphere event venue in Paradise, Nevada, in the Las Vegas Valley and New York-based regional sports network chain MSG Networks.
MTX vs SPHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $519.5M | $393.8M |
| Net Profit | $37.2M | $64.7M |
| Gross Margin | 24.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 7.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | 16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $2.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $519.5M | $393.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.4M | $262.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $528.9M | $282.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $491.8M | $280.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $518.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $524.7M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.2M | $272.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.5M | $320.6M |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.0M | $-101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $151.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-144.0M | $-82.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | $-105.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.7M | $-47.2M |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -49.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | -17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.6% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | -51.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | -66.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | -12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | -38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 53.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.3% | -29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -46.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | -17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | -14.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $2.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.37 | $-2.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.44 | $3.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.51 | $-2.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.45 | $-2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.61 | $-1.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.44 | $-1.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $332.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $961.3M | $692.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.3M | $384.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.9M | $355.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $312.2M | $465.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.4M | $559.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $961.3M | $692.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.3M | $733.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $965.6M | $743.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $966.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $966.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $922.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $922.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $925.8M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.58× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.3M | $180.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.73× | 2.78× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.3M | $180.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.9M | $115.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.9M | $-59.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.0M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $-72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.9M | $101.0M |
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.73× | 2.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | -0.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.20× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTX
| High Temperature Technologies | $178.0M | 34% |
| Specialty Additives | $141.8M | 27% |
| Household And Personal Care | $132.5M | 26% |
| Environmental And Infrastructure | $67.2M | 13% |
SPHR
| Ticketing And Venue License Fee Revenues | $198.5M | 50% |
| Media Networks Revenue | $120.1M | 30% |
| Sponsorship Signage Exosphere Advertising And Suite Licenses | $32.2M | 8% |
| Food Beverage And Merchandise Revenues | $27.6M | 7% |
| Other | $13.2M | 3% |
| Related Party | $2.3M | 1% |
