vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC (MTX) and StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($519.5M vs $468.1M, roughly 1.1× StubHub Holdings, Inc.). MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs -276.6%, a 283.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, StubHub Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 0.3%). StubHub Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($180.3M vs $31.9M).
Compass Minerals International, Inc is an American public company that, through its subsidiaries, is a leading producer of minerals, including salt, magnesium chloride and sulfate of potash. Based in Overland Park, Kansas; the company provides bulk treated and untreated highway deicing salt to customers in North America and the United Kingdom and plant nutrition products to growers worldwide. Compass Minerals also produces consumer deicing and water conditioning products, consumer and commerc...
StubHub Holdings operates a leading global online ticket marketplace for live entertainment events. It facilitates secure resale and direct purchase of tickets for concerts, sports matches, theater performances and other live experiences, serving consumers, event organizers and sellers across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
MTX vs STUB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $519.5M | $468.1M |
| Net Profit | $37.2M | $-1.3B |
| Gross Margin | 24.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -292.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | -276.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.1% | -3821.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $-4.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $519.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.4M | $468.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $528.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $491.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $518.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $524.7M | $433.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.0M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-144.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -292.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | -276.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.37 | $-4.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.44 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.51 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.45 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.61 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.44 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $332.6M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $961.3M | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $312.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $961.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $965.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $966.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $966.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $922.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $922.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $925.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $815.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.3M | $181.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.9M | $180.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 38.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.2% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.73× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.9M | $181.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $180.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.20× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTX
| High Temperature Technologies | $178.0M | 34% |
| Specialty Additives | $141.8M | 27% |
| Household And Personal Care | $132.5M | 26% |
| Environmental And Infrastructure | $67.2M | 13% |
STUB
| Transaction Fees | $453.4M | 97% |
| Other | $14.7M | 3% |
