vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC (MTX) and STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. (STWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($519.5M vs $492.9M, roughly 1.1× STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC.). STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs 7.2%, a 12.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (-1.4% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Compass Minerals International, Inc is an American public company that, through its subsidiaries, is a leading producer of minerals, including salt, magnesium chloride and sulfate of potash. Based in Overland Park, Kansas; the company provides bulk treated and untreated highway deicing salt to customers in North America and the United Kingdom and plant nutrition products to growers worldwide. Compass Minerals also produces consumer deicing and water conditioning products, consumer and commerc...
Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc. was one of the largest companies that owned, operated, franchised and managed hotels, resorts, spas, residences, and vacation ownership properties. Starwood was founded in 1969 as a real estate investment trust named Hotel Investors Trust. In 1995, it was acquired and reorganized by Barry Sternlicht, who was its chairman until 2005 and founder of the Starwood Capital Group. Starwood had 11 brands and owned, managed, or franchised 1,297 properties co...
MTX vs STWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $519.5M | $492.9M |
| Net Profit | $37.2M | $96.9M |
| Gross Margin | 24.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 26.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.1% | 87.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $519.5M | $492.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.4M | $488.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $528.9M | $444.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $491.8M | $418.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $518.1M | $454.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $524.7M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.2M | $489.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.5M | $523.1M |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $96.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.0M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $129.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-144.0M | $112.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | $76.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $77.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.7M | $154.3M |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.6% | 28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | 30.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.37 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.44 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.51 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.45 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.61 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.44 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $332.6M | $499.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $961.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $6.8B |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $63.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $332.6M | $499.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.3M | $301.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.9M | $259.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $312.2M | $440.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | $377.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.5M | $357.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.4M | $259.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | $327.4M |
| Q4 25 | $961.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $965.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $966.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $966.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $922.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $922.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $925.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $6.3B |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $63.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $62.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $62.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $62.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $62.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $64.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $64.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $66.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.3M | $488.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.73× | 5.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.3M | $488.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.9M | $337.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.9M | $-87.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $238.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.4M | $295.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.0M | $241.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $53.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.9M | $55.9M |
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.73× | 5.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.65× | 4.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | -0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.30× | 5.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | 3.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.54× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.20× | 0.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTX
| High Temperature Technologies | $178.0M | 34% |
| Specialty Additives | $141.8M | 27% |
| Household And Personal Care | $132.5M | 26% |
| Environmental And Infrastructure | $67.2M | 13% |
STWD
| Commercial And Residential Lending Segment | $335.2M | 68% |
| Infrastructure Lending Segment | $70.3M | 14% |
| Property Segment | $57.8M | 12% |
| Other | $29.7M | 6% |
