vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Micron Technology (MU) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Micron Technology is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.9B vs $22.2B, roughly 1.1× Procter & Gamble). Micron Technology runs the higher net margin — 57.8% vs 19.4%, a 38.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Micron Technology posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (196.3% vs 1.5%). Micron Technology produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.5B vs $3.8B). Over the past eight quarters, Micron Technology's revenue compounded faster (87.2% CAGR vs 4.9%).
Micron Technology, Inc. is an American producer of computer memory and computer data storage including dynamic random-access memory, flash memory, and solid-state drives (SSDs). It is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation incorporated and headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio.
MU vs PG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.9B | $22.2B |
| Net Profit | $13.8B | $4.3B |
| Gross Margin | 74.4% | 51.2% |
| Operating Margin | 67.6% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 57.8% | 19.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 196.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 770.8% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $12.07 | $1.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.6B | $22.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3B | $22.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3B | $20.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1B | $19.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7B | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $21.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | 74.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | 51.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | 51.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.4% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.3% | 52.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.9% | 49.6% |
| Q1 26 | 67.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.0% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 18.9% |
| Q1 26 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 15.3% |
| Q1 26 | $12.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.60 | $1.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.83 | $1.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.68 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.41 | $1.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $1.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | $1.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.9B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $72.5B | $53.3B |
| Total Assets | $101.5B | $127.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $13.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $72.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.8B | $53.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.2B | $53.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.7B | $52.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.6B | $52.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.8B | $51.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.1B | $52.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2B | $50.6B |
| Q1 26 | $101.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.0B | $127.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8B | $127.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4B | $125.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.1B | $123.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5B | $122.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.4B | $126.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.3B | $122.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.9B | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.5B | $3.8B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 23.1% | 17.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.8% | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.86× | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9B | $14.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-113.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.0M | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 24.2% |
| Q1 26 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 140.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 108.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.61× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.47× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.45× | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.49× | 0.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.73× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.48× | 1.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MU
| CMBU | $7.7B | 32% |
| MCBU | $7.7B | 32% |
| CDBU | $5.7B | 24% |
| AEBU | $2.7B | 11% |
| Other Product Sales | $95.0M | 0% |
PG
| Fabric Home Care Segment | $7.7B | 35% |
| Baby Feminine Family Care Segment | $5.1B | 23% |
| Beauty Segment | $4.0B | 18% |
| Health Care Segment | $3.4B | 15% |
| Grooming Segment | $1.8B | 8% |
