vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MICROVISION, INC. (MVIS) and LQR House Inc. (YHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LQR House Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($299.7K vs $223.0K, roughly 1.3× MICROVISION, INC.). On growth, LQR House Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-64.2% vs -86.5%). Over the past eight quarters, LQR House Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-21.1% CAGR vs -51.7%).
MicroVision Inc. is a technology company specializing in advanced LiDAR sensors, miniature display solutions, and perception software. Its core products serve automotive ADAS, augmented reality devices, consumer electronics, and industrial automation markets, delivering high-precision, low-power sensing technologies for next-generation smart applications.
LQR House Inc. is a US-based alcohol beverage e-commerce and distribution company. It offers a broad portfolio of spirits, wine, and beer, operating two core segments: direct-to-consumer retail for individuals and wholesale distribution for business clients across the United States.
MVIS vs YHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.0K | $299.7K |
| Net Profit | — | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1000.3% |
| Net Margin | — | -1368.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -86.5% | -64.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.2% | 72.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $223.0K | $299.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.0K | $337.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.0K | $498.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $589.0K | $429.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $838.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0K | $624.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $557.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $956.0K | $481.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.2M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.2M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.3M | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -149.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -27.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -33.6% | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1000.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5278.4% | -1134.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9455.5% | -442.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2383.7% | -559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1119.5% | -1221.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8266.3% | -561.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1296.4% | -407.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2793.9% | -513.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1368.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5899.2% | -4989.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9180.0% | -441.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4886.1% | -556.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1888.2% | -1760.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8166.8% | -538.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1259.5% | -396.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2752.4% | -504.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $-88.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $-21.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $-15.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-18.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $74.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.5M | $29.3M |
| Total Assets | $103.1M | $31.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.1M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $55.5M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.7M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.1M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.2M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.8M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $103.1M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.7M | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.2M | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-58.7M | $-14.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-59.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26636.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 304.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-103.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-58.7M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.5M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.7M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.1M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-20.8M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-59.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-20.9M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | -26636.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6894.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8346.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2410.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -918.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7421.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -989.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2183.4% | -287.7% |
| Q4 25 | 304.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 134.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 2.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
