vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAXLINEAR, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.2M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.5× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 13.7%).
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
MXL vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $137.2M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $-45.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | -32.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 43.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -203.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.52 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $137.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.4M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.5M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.9M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.2M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.1M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $72.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-45.5M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.8M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.3M | $5.5M |
| Q1 26 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.9% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.6% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.4% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 43.5% |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.7% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.6% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.4% | -7.1% |
| Q1 26 | -32.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.0% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -51.8% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -62.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.7% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.68 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.90 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.1M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $123.8M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $454.2M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $771.3M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.27× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.8M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.9M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.8M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.6M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.1M | $65.1M |
| Q1 26 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M |
| Q1 26 | $454.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $451.9M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $464.7M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $488.3M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.2M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.3M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $556.9M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.3M | $566.2M |
| Q1 26 | $771.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $808.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $863.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $855.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $864.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.2M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MXL
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
