vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $137.2M, roughly 1.5× MAXLINEAR, INC). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -32.9%, a 35.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs -3.3%).
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
MXL vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $137.2M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-45.1M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -32.9% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.0% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -203.0% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.52 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $137.2M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.4M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.5M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.9M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.2M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.1M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.9M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-45.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.6M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.8M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.3M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | 57.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.9% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.6% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.6% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.0% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.7% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.4% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | -32.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.4% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -51.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -62.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.7% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.52 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.17 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.68 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.90 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.1M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $123.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $454.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $771.3M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.1M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.8M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.9M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.8M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.6M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.1M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $454.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $451.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $464.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $488.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $556.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $771.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $808.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $863.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $855.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $864.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.2M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.7M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
