vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. (MYPS) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($55.4M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.1× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -24.7%, a 34.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -18.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Sila Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -15.6%).
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. develops and publishes free-to-play social and casual casino games for mobile, desktop and social platforms. It operates a loyalty rewards program that lets players redeem in-game achievements for real-world benefits including travel, dining and event tickets, serving markets across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
MYPS vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $55.4M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-13.7M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -17.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -24.7% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -18.3% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 38.9% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $55.4M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.6M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.7M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.2M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.6M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-567.0K | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | -17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -24.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.8% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.6% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.7% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $104.9M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $227.9M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $290.6M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.3M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.9M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.1M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $105.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.3M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.0M | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | $227.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $245.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $244.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $288.4M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $290.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $299.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $313.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $330.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $357.5M | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.7M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.6M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
