vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS) and PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (PACB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.6M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.7× NaaS Technology Inc.). PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. runs the higher net margin — -90.4% vs -193.3%, a 102.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NaaS Technology Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (121.2% vs 13.8%).
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. is an American biotechnology company founded in 2004 that develops and manufactures systems for gene sequencing and some novel real time biological observation. PacBio has two principal sequencing platforms: single-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT), based on the properties of zero-mode waveguides and sequencing by binding (SBB) chemistry, which uses native nucleotides and scarless incorporation for DNA binding and extension.
NAAS vs PACB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $44.6M |
| Net Profit | $-50.0M | $-40.4M |
| Gross Margin | 29.2% | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | -144.2% | -92.3% |
| Net Margin | -193.3% | -90.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 121.2% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 18.4% | -1802.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $44.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.9M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-40.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-426.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-60.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.0M | $-173.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-78.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -92.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -101.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -112.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1154.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -390.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -160.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -144.2% | -488.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -209.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -90.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -98.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -105.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1146.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -151.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -193.3% | -481.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -201.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.7M | $279.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-33.4M | $5.3M |
| Total Assets | $180.2M | $784.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $279.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $314.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $389.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $471.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | $509.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $561.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $506.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $453.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.4M | $492.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $649.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $784.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $803.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $825.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $860.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $180.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-25.7M | $-19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -44.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-114.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $-54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-75.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-45.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-46.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-55.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-79.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -75.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -122.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -82.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -115.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -154.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -205.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NAAS
Segment breakdown not available.
PACB
| Products | $39.0M | 87% |
| Service And Other | $5.7M | 13% |
