vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of N-able, Inc. (NABL) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
N-able, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($130.3M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.6× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
NABL vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $130.3M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | 76.2% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.2M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.2M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.5M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.4M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 76.2% | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.5% | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.1% | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.6% | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.0% | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.9% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.0% | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.9M | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $804.7M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.9M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.1M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.2M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.4M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.5M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.9M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.7M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.1M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.6M | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.1M | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.6M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.1M | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $804.7M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $813.4M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.4M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $775.1M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.3M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.0M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $724.4M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.46× | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $20.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.3M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
