vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of N-able, Inc. (NABL) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $130.3M, roughly 1.5× N-able, Inc.). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs 5.2%). N-able, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.9M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, N-able, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
NABL vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $130.3M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 76.2% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.2M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.2M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.5M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.4M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 76.2% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.5% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.1% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.0% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.0% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $804.7M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.9M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.1M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.2M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.4M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.5M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $804.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $813.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $775.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $724.4M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.3M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $20.9M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.1M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.3M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.36× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.04× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.89× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
