vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V. (NAMS) and Spok Holdings, Inc (SPOK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Spok Holdings, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.9M vs $19.1M, roughly 1.8× NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V.). Spok Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -90.7%, a 99.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (740.1% vs -0.1%). Spok Holdings, Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.1M vs $-37.8M).

Kite Pharma, Inc. is an American biotechnology company that develops cancer immunotherapy products with a primary focus on genetically engineered autologous CAR T cell therapy - a cell-based therapy which relies on chimeric antigen receptors and T cells. Founded in 2009, and based in Santa Monica, California, it was acquired by Gilead Sciences in 2017.

Spok Holdings, Inc. is a global provider of critical communication solutions primarily serving the healthcare industry. It offers unified clinical communication platforms, secure messaging tools, alerting systems, and on-call scheduling software that help care teams coordinate efficiently, cut response times, and boost patient safety across medical facilities.

NAMS vs SPOK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SPOK
SPOK
1.8× larger
SPOK
$33.9M
$19.1M
NAMS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
NAMS
NAMS
+740.2% gap
NAMS
740.1%
-0.1%
SPOK
Higher net margin
SPOK
SPOK
99.4% more per $
SPOK
8.7%
-90.7%
NAMS
More free cash flow
SPOK
SPOK
$47.9M more FCF
SPOK
$10.1M
$-37.8M
NAMS

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Revenue
$19.1M
$33.9M
Net Profit
$-17.4M
$2.9M
Gross Margin
76.7%
Operating Margin
-186.1%
11.6%
Net Margin
-90.7%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
740.1%
-0.1%
Net Profit YoY
55.5%
-19.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.15
$0.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$33.9M
Q3 25
$33.9M
Q2 25
$19.1M
$35.7M
Q1 25
$36.3M
Q4 24
$12.8M
$33.9M
Q3 24
$29.1M
$34.9M
Q2 24
$34.0M
Q1 24
$34.9M
Net Profit
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$2.9M
Q3 25
$3.2M
Q2 25
$-17.4M
$4.6M
Q1 25
$5.2M
Q4 24
$-92.2M
$3.6M
Q3 24
$-16.6M
$3.7M
Q2 24
$3.4M
Q1 24
$4.2M
Gross Margin
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
76.7%
Q3 25
78.3%
Q2 25
79.5%
Q1 25
80.1%
Q4 24
78.5%
Q3 24
79.5%
Q2 24
78.9%
Q1 24
79.5%
Operating Margin
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
12.9%
Q2 25
-186.1%
15.1%
Q1 25
16.6%
Q4 24
-338.5%
13.7%
Q3 24
-85.9%
14.2%
Q2 24
13.2%
Q1 24
14.0%
Net Margin
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
8.7%
Q3 25
9.5%
Q2 25
-90.7%
12.8%
Q1 25
14.3%
Q4 24
-721.7%
10.8%
Q3 24
-57.2%
10.5%
Q2 24
10.1%
Q1 24
12.1%
EPS (diluted)
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$0.13
Q3 25
$0.15
Q2 25
$-0.15
$0.22
Q1 25
$0.25
Q4 24
$-0.91
$0.17
Q3 24
$-0.18
$0.18
Q2 24
$0.17
Q1 24
$0.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$739.2M
$25.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$778.5M
$146.4M
Total Assets
$815.1M
$206.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$25.3M
Q3 25
$21.4M
Q2 25
$739.2M
$20.2M
Q1 25
$19.9M
Q4 24
$834.2M
$29.1M
Q3 24
$422.7M
$27.8M
Q2 24
$23.9M
Q1 24
$23.3M
Stockholders' Equity
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$146.4M
Q3 25
$148.7M
Q2 25
$778.5M
$150.9M
Q1 25
$151.7M
Q4 24
$757.5M
$154.7M
Q3 24
$378.9M
$156.3M
Q2 24
$158.2M
Q1 24
$160.2M
Total Assets
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$206.1M
Q3 25
$209.7M
Q2 25
$815.1M
$208.7M
Q1 25
$204.5M
Q4 24
$864.6M
$217.1M
Q3 24
$439.2M
$216.8M
Q2 24
$216.4M
Q1 24
$215.0M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-37.7M
$11.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-37.8M
$10.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-197.2%
29.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
4.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.93×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-119.7M
$25.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$11.5M
Q3 25
$8.1M
Q2 25
$-37.7M
$7.0M
Q1 25
$2.3M
Q4 24
$-37.5M
$8.4M
Q3 24
$-12.5M
$11.1M
Q2 24
$7.4M
Q1 24
$2.0M
Free Cash Flow
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
$10.1M
Q3 25
$7.6M
Q2 25
$-37.8M
$6.0M
Q1 25
$1.5M
Q4 24
$-37.5M
$7.5M
Q3 24
$-12.6M
$10.3M
Q2 24
$6.8M
Q1 24
$1.1M
FCF Margin
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
29.9%
Q3 25
22.4%
Q2 25
-197.2%
16.8%
Q1 25
4.2%
Q4 24
-293.5%
22.3%
Q3 24
-43.2%
29.4%
Q2 24
20.0%
Q1 24
3.2%
Capex Intensity
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
4.1%
Q3 25
1.6%
Q2 25
0.5%
2.9%
Q1 25
2.1%
Q4 24
0.0%
2.5%
Q3 24
0.3%
2.4%
Q2 24
1.9%
Q1 24
2.5%
Cash Conversion
NAMS
NAMS
SPOK
SPOK
Q4 25
3.93×
Q3 25
2.54×
Q2 25
1.55×
Q1 25
0.43×
Q4 24
2.31×
Q3 24
3.03×
Q2 24
2.17×
Q1 24
0.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

NAMS
NAMS

Segment breakdown not available.

SPOK
SPOK

Paging$16.8M50%
Software Operations$16.0M47%
License$1.2M4%

Related Comparisons