vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Navan, Inc. (NAVN) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $194.9M, roughly 1.0× Navan, Inc.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -115.6%, a 117.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. ROGERS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1M vs $-1.9M).
Navan, Inc. is an American corporate travel and expense management company headquartered in Palo Alto, California. Founded in May 2015 by Ariel Cohen and Ilan Twig, Navan offers an integrated platform combining travel booking, corporate-issued payment cards, expense reporting, and analytics for businesses worldwide.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
NAVN vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $194.9M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-225.4M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 70.7% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -40.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -115.6% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -483.6% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.58 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $194.9M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-225.4M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 70.7% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -40.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -115.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.58 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $809.1M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $206.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $809.1M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $206.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.9M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.0% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.3M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NAVN
| Usage Based Revenue | $179.9M | 92% |
| Subscription Revenue | $15.0M | 8% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
