vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NBT BANCORP INC (NBTB) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.4× NBT BANCORP INC). NBT BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.7% vs -125.2%, a 152.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
NBT Bank, N.A. is an American financial institution that operates through a network of 176 banking locations in New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine and Connecticut. NBT Bank and its parent company, NBT Bancorp Inc., are headquartered in Norwich, New York, United States. NBT Bancorp is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol NBTB.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
NBTB vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.5M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $51.1M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 27.7% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.98 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $184.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.7M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $51.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.8% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.69 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $160.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $16.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $160.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $16.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $235.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.3M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 118.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 119.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NBTB
| Net Interest Income | $134.3M | 73% |
| Noninterest Income | $50.1M | 27% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
