vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of nCino, Inc. (NCNO) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $152.2M, roughly 1.3× nCino, Inc.). nCino, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 2.2%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, nCino, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 5.2%). nCino, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.9M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, nCino, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.9% CAGR vs -3.3%).
nCino, Inc. is a global financial technology company headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina. The company offers its cloud-based banking software and core banking platform. The nCino Platform is used by banks and credit unions, and enterprise financial institutions.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
NCNO vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.2M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.6% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 224.5% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $152.2M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.8M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.4M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.8M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.4M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.1M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.6M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.3M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.2% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.0% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.0% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.6% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.6M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $87.6M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.9M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.2M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.9M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.9M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.4M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.5M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.9M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.78× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.7M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.4M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.1M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.2% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.78× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NCNO
| License And Service | $133.4M | 88% |
| Professional Services | $18.8M | 12% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
