vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) and IMPINJ INC (PI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMPINJ INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.3M vs $50.6M, roughly 1.5× NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 11.2%, a 18.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs -0.0%). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.9M vs $2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.4% CAGR vs -14.9%).
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is a global oilfield services and energy technology provider specializing in engineered completion systems for onshore and offshore oil and gas production. It offers multistage fracturing tools that optimize well performance, serving major operators across North America, Latin America, the Middle East and Asia-Pacific, focusing on boosting operational efficiency and resource recovery for upstream energy clients.
Impinj, Inc. is an American manufacturer of radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices and software. The company was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. The company was started based on the research done at the California Institute of Technology by Carver Mead and Chris Diorio. Impinj currently produces EPC Class 1, Gen 2 passive UHF RFID chips, RFID readers, RFID reader chips, and RFID antennas, and software applications for encoding chips, and gathering business ...
NCSM vs PI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.6M | $74.3M |
| Net Profit | $15.0M | $8.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 30.5% |
| Net Margin | 29.5% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.5% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 331.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.43 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | $96.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.5M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $95.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $102.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $924.0K | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $221.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.3% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | -12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.0% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | -13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | -11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.43 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.37 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.51 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.34 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.60 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.21 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.7M | $131.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.3M | $241.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $126.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $181.2M | $502.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.7M | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $190.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.4M | $193.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $147.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.9M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | $220.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $241.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $280.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $283.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $126.2M | $209.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.1M | $195.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.4M | $187.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.2M | $160.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.0M | $136.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.0M | $117.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $502.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $545.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0M | $516.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $158.0M | $508.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.1M | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.8M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.8M | $476.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.4M | $446.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | 1.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.08× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.9M | $2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.5% | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $21.0M | $61.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $44.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | -17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | 43.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.81× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.49× | 45.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NCSM
| Products | $33.8M | 67% |
| Services | $16.8M | 33% |
PI
Segment breakdown not available.
