vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Neonode Inc. (NEON) and Varex Imaging Corp (VREX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Varex Imaging Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($209.6M vs $430.0K, roughly 487.4× Neonode Inc.). Neonode Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3298.6% vs 1.1%, a 3297.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Varex Imaging Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.9% vs -48.7%). Neonode Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.6M vs $-26.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Varex Imaging Corp's revenue compounded faster (0.8% CAGR vs -34.5%).
Neonode Inc. develops and markets innovative optical touch sensing and contactless gesture recognition technologies for global clients. Its core offerings include zForce sensing modules, embedded software solutions and custom integration services, deployed across key end segments including automotive infotainment systems, industrial human-machine interfaces, consumer electronics and medical devices.
Varex Imaging Corp is a global supplier of advanced imaging components and solutions, including X-ray tubes, digital flat panel detectors, and image processing software. Its products serve medical imaging, radiation oncology, and industrial non-destructive testing segments, with customers across key global markets.
NEON vs VREX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $430.0K | $209.6M |
| Net Profit | $14.2M | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 97.9% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.3% |
| Net Margin | 3298.6% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -48.7% | 4.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1404.9% | 866.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $209.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $228.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.0K | $203.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $599.0K | $212.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.0K | $199.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $838.0K | $205.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $801.0K | $209.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $814.0K | $206.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2M | $-89.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-300.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-51.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $1.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 97.9% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.0% | 36.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 98.2% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.3% | 32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 97.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 97.9% | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -39.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -352.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -383.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -146.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -223.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.7% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3298.6% | -43.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -311.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -337.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -129.7% | -24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -211.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -256.0% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $-1.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.6M | $125.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $367.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.8M | $476.9M |
| Total Assets | $32.8M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.77× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $125.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $155.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $152.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $223.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $212.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $190.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $188.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $367.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $367.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $367.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $567.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $567.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $443.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $443.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $442.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $476.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $472.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.8M | $455.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | $549.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $540.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $529.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | $581.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.0M | $576.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.9M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.5M | $-16.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | $-26.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -372.6% | -12.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.4% | 5.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.11× | -7.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-13.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $3.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-26.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -372.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -296.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -272.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -7.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NEON
Segment breakdown not available.
VREX
| Medical Segment | $144.8M | 69% |
| Industrial Segment | $64.8M | 31% |
