vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE) and Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
New Fortress Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($326.2M vs $220.2M, roughly 1.5× Shutterstock, Inc.). Shutterstock, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.3% vs -259.7%, a 252.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, New Fortress Energy Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.0% vs -12.0%). Shutterstock, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.9M vs $-134.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Shutterstock, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.4% CAGR vs -26.8%).
New Fortress Energy Inc. is a global energy infrastructure firm developing, owning and operating LNG import/export terminals, natural gas supply networks and low-carbon projects. It serves utility, industrial and public sector clients across the Americas and Caribbean, delivering affordable, lower-emission energy resources.
Shutterstock, Inc. is an American provider of stock photography, stock footage, stock music, and editing tools; it is headquartered in New York. Founded in 2002 by programmer and photographer Jon Oringer, Shutterstock maintains a library of around 200 million royalty-free stock photos, vector graphics, and illustrations, with around 10 million video clips and music tracks available for licensing. Originally a subscription site only, Shutterstock expanded beyond subscriptions into à la carte p...
NFE vs SSTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $326.2M | $220.2M |
| Net Profit | $-847.1M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | -193.0% | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | -259.7% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -277.4% | -1021.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.03 | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $326.2M | $220.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.1M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.9M | $242.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $350.7M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $446.0M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $220.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $609.5M | $214.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-847.1M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-263.0M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-546.5M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-175.4M | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-224.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.1M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 60.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 58.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.8% | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.4% | 58.8% |
| Q4 25 | -193.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -170.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -259.7% | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -109.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -239.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.0% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.03 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.96 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.99 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.65 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $226.5M | $178.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $182.6M | $581.0M |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 44.78× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $226.5M | $178.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $551.1M | $116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $447.9M | $112.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.9M | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.8M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.5M | $71.8M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $182.6M | $581.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $594.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $586.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $547.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $522.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $520.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $541.3M |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 44.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-76.2M | $36.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-134.8M | $25.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.3% | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.0% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.4B | $123.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-76.2M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-171.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-329.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $445.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.0M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.9M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-134.8M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.6M | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-726.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-262.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-210.3M | $-952.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-367.0M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-493.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-457.9M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | -41.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -96.4% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -318.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.0% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -169.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -75.1% | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 18.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 174.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 187.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 208.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 85.5% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.15× | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.16× | 0.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.